Functional condition of the left ventricle after myocardial revascularization in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction at different times from the onset of symptoms

Main Article Content

M. Yu. Sokolov
Yu. V. Kashuba
Yu. M. Sokolov

Abstract

The aim – to conducted in order to determine the effect of myocardial revascularization performed at different times from the onset of symptoms in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) on the function of left ventricular (LV) contractility during long-term follow-up (within 1 year) according to echocardiography. In addition, the study evaluated the functional state of the LV in patients with NSTEMI who did not undergo revascularization of the myocardium.
Materials and methods. Patients with NSTEMI included in the study (n=128) were divided into 5 groups according to the time of revascularization (emergent or selective revascularization), as well as by the method of revascularization (stenting or bypass grafting), including a group of patients who did not undergo revascularization. Group 1 consisted of patients (n=28) who underwent emergent coronary angiography and ad hoc stenting in the first 72 hours from the onset of symptoms. Group 2 included patients (n=61) who underwent coronary angiography and coronary stenting in a planned manner after 72 hours or more from the onset of symptoms. Group 3 included patients (n=12) who underwent a scheduled bypass operation selectively. Group 4 consisted of patients with NSTEMI (n=27) who, after emergent coronary angiography, did not undergo revascularization control group. And group 5 is a general revascularization group, which consists of patients from all of the above groups (n=101) who underwent revascularization in any way. Patients of all groups underwent initial coronary angiography, determined the initial level of cardiac troponins, performed an ultrasound examination of the left ventricle using a standard technique to evaluate the initial indicators of regional and general myocardial contractility. In the absence of contraindications (patients of groups 2 and 3), tests with dosed physical activity were performed (to identify the class of angina pectoris). During the short-term (upon discharge from the hospital, after 1 month and after 3 months), as well as long-term (after 6 months and after 1 year), the parameters of the left ventricular contractile function – the ejection fraction (LVEF) were repeatedly measured and the functional class of angina was determined.
Results and discussion. An analysis of the results of testing with dosed physical activity revealed the following: if class 0–I angina before stenting in patients with NSTEMI stenting was 0 % of cases, then after 6 months of observation this figure was 70.6 %, and 12 months after stenting – 73.8 %. The number of cases of severe angina pectoris decreased from 44.1 % during the initial examination to 7.7 % after 12 months of follow-up. An analysis of the results of indicators of regional and general LV contractility revealed a significantly significant improvement in these parameters in patients with NSTEMI after 12 months in both the urgent group and the planned stenting group. The number of normokinetic segments increased by 10 % (from 84.2 to 94.2 %), and the number of hypokinetic segments decreased by more than 2 times (from 16.5 to 6.8 %). LVEF indicators for 12 months of observation both in the urgent group and in the planned stenting group significantly increased. In the control group, as well as in the coronary bypass group, no significant changes in LV contractile function were observed for 12 months after NSTEMI.
Conclusions. Coronary stenting, both urgent and planned, in patients with NSTEMI, according to a year of observation, significantly improves the functional and volume indicators of LV. The improvement of these indicators significantly reduced the class of angina in NSTEMI patients after stenting, which improved the quality of life of these patients.

Article Details

Keywords:

non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, coronary angiography, coronary stenting, echocardiography, myocardial contractility, left ventricle ejection fraction

References

Anderson J.L., Adams C.D., Antman E.M. et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.– 2007.– Vol. 50.– P. 157. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.102.14.1739.

Badimon L., Padro T., Vilahur G. Atherosclerosis, platelets and thrombosis in acute ischaemic heart disease // Eur. Heart J. Acute Cardiovasc. Care.– 2012.– Vol. 1.– P. 60–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2048872612441582.

Badings E.A., The S.H., Dambrink J.H. et al. Early or late intervention in highrisk non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: results of the ELISA-3 trial // EuroIntervention.– 2013.– Vol. 9.– P. 54–61. doi: https://doi.org/10.4244/eijv9i1a9.

Bassand J.P., Hamm CW, Ardissino D. et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes // Eur. Heart J.– 2007.– Vol. 28.– P. 1598–660. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehm499.

Bavry A.A., Kumbhani D.J., Rassi A.N. et al. Benefit of early invasive therapy in acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis of contemporary randomized clinical trials // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.– 2006.– Vol. 48.– P. 1319–1325. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.06.050.

Brooks G.C., Lee B.C., Rajni Rao R. et al. Predicting Persistent Left Ventricular Dysfunction Following Myocardial Infarction: PREDiction of ICd Treatment Study (PREDICTS) // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.– 2016.– Vol. 67.– P. 1186–1196. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.12.042.

Buller C.E., Dzavik V., Carere R.G. et al., for the TOSCA Investigators. Primary stenting versus balloon angioplasty in occluded coronary arteries: The Total Occlusion Study of Canada (TOSCA) // Circulation.– 1998.– Vol. 100.– P. 236–242. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.100.3.236.

Chierchia S., Brunelli C., Simonetti I. et al. Sequence of events in angina at rest: primary reduction in coronary flow // Circulation.– 1980.– Vol. 61.– P. 759. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.61.4.759.

Crawford T. Pathology of ischaemic heart disease.– London: Butterworths, 1977.– 48 p. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3347-3_1.

Davi G., Patrono C. Platelet activation and atherothrombosis // New Engl. J. Med.– 2007.– Vol. 357.– P. 2482–2494. doi: https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmra071014.

Epstein S.E., Talbot T.L. Dynamic coronary tone in precipitation, exacerbation and relief of angina pectoris // Am. J. Cardiol.– 1981.– Vol. 48.– P. 797. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(81)90160-0.

Falk E. Unstable angina with fatal outcome: dynamic coronary thrombosis leading to infarction and/or sudden death. Autopsy evidence of recurrent mural thrombosis with peri­­pheral embolization culminating in total vascular occlusion // Circulation.– 1985.– Vol. 71.– P. 699–708. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.71.4.699.

Holmes D.R., Hartzler G.O., Smith H.C., Fuster V. Coronary artery thrombosis in patients with unstable angina // Br. Heart J.– 1981.– Vol. 45.– P. 411. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.45.4.411.

Kofoed K.F., Kelbak H., Hansen P.R. et al. Early versus standard care invasive examination and treatment of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: VERDICT randomized controlled trial // Circulation.– 2018.– Vol. 138.– P. 2741–2750. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.118.037152.

Krumholz H.M., Anderson J.L., Bachelder B.L. et al. ACC/AHA 2008 Performance Measures for Adults With STEleva­­tion and Non–ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures (Writing Committee to Develop Performance Measures for ST-Elevation and Non–ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) // Circulation.– 2008.– Vol. 118.– P. 2596–2648. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.108.191099.

Libby P. Mechanisms of acute coronary syndromes and their implications for therapy // New Engl. J. Med.– 2013.– Vol. 368.– P. 2004–2013. doi: https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmra1216063.

Mandelkorn J.B., Wolf N.M., Singh S. et al. Intracoronary thrombus in nontransmural myocardial infarction and in unstable angina pectoris // Am. J. Cardiol.– 1983.– Vol. 52.– P. 1. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(83)90059-0.

Mandelzweig L., Battler A., Boyko V. et al. The Second Euro Heart Survey on Acute Coronary Syndromes: characteristics, treatment, and outcome of patients with ACS in Europe and the Mediterranean basin in 2004 // Eur. Heart J.– 2006.– Vol. 27.– P. 2285–2293. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehl196.

Marino P., Zanolla L., Zardini P. Effect of streptokinase on left ventricular modeling and function after myocardial infarction: the GISSI trial // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.– 1989.– Vol. 14.– P. 1149–1158. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(89)90409-9.

Maseri A., Chierchia S., Davies G.J., Fox K.M. Variable susceptibility to dynamic coronary obstruction: an elusive link between coronary atherosclerosis and angina pectoris // Am. J. Cardiol.– 1983.– Vol. 52.– P. 46A. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(83)90176-5.

Maseri A., Pesola A., Marzilli M. et al. Coronary vasospasm in angina pectoris // Lancet.– 1977.– Vol. 1.– P. 713. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(77)92164-x.

McManus D.D., Gore J., Yarzebski J. et al. Recent trends in the incidence, treatment, and outcomes of patients with STEMI and NSTEMI // Am. J. Med.– 2011.– Vol. 124.– P. 40–47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.07.023.

Mehta S.R., Cannon C.P., Fox K.A. et al. Routine vs selective invasive strategies in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials // JAMA.– 2005.– Vol. 293.– P. 2908– 2917. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.23.2908.

Mehta S.R., Granger C.B., Boden W.E. et al. TIMACS Investigators. Early versus delayed invasive intervention in acute coronary syndromes // New Engl. J. Med.– 2009.– Vol. 360.– P. 2165–2175. doi: https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0807986.

Miller A.L., Chadi Dib, Li Li et al. Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Assessment Among Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Its Association with Hospital Quality of Care and Evidence-Based Therapy Use // Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes.– 2012.– Vol. 5.– P. 662–671. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/circoutcomes.112.965012.

Miller A.L., Gosch K., Daugherty S.L. et al. Failure to Reassess Ejection Fraction after Acute Myocardial Infarction in Potential Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Candidates: Insights from the Translational Research Investigating Underlying Disparities in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients' Health Status (TRIUMPH) Registry // Am. Heart J.– 2013.– Vol. 166 (4).– P. 737–743. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2013.07.019.

Milosevic A., Vasiljevic-Pokrajcic Z., Milasinovic D. et al. Immediate versus delayed invasive intervention for non-STEMI patients: the RIDDLE-NSTEMI study // JACC Cardiovasc. Interv.– 2016.– Vol. 9.– P. 541–549. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2015.11.018.

Montalescot G., Cayla G., Collet J.P. et al., ABOARD Investigators. Immediate vs delayed intervention for acute coronary syndromes: a randomized clinical trial // JAMA.– 2009.– Vol. 302.– P. 947–954. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.1267.

National Institute for Clinical Excellence. NICE guideline: unstable angina and NSTEMI: the early management of unstable angina and non–ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction.2010. Available at: http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG/ Wave14/24#keydocs.AccessedFebruary2, 2010. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-4160-3773-6.10060-6.

Neumann F.J., Kastrati A., PogatsaMurray G. et al. Evaluation of prolonged antithrombotic pretreatment (cooling-off strategy) before intervention in patients with unstable coronary syndromes: a randomized controlled trial // JAMA.– 2003.– Vol. 290.– P. 1593–1599. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.290.12.1593.

O’Donoghue M., Boden W.E., Braunwald E. et al. Early invasive vs conservative treatment strategies in women and men with unstable angina and non-STsegment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis // JAMA.– 2008.– Vol. 300.– P. 71–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.300.1.71.

Pfeffer M.A., Braunwald E. Ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction: experimental observations and clinical implications // Circulation.– 1990.– Vol. 81.– P. 1161–1172. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.81.4.1161.

Rouleau J.L., de Champlain J., Klein M. et al. Activation of neurohumoral systems in postinfarction left ventricular dysfunction // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.–1993.– Vol. 22.– P. 390–398. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(93)90042-y.

Savonitto S., Ardissino D., Granger C.B. et al. Prognostic value of the admission electrocardiogram in acute coronary syndromes // JAMA.– 1999.– Vol. 281.– P. 707–713. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.281.8.707.

Sinapius D. Hiufigkeit und Morphologie der Coronarthrombose und ihre Beziehungen zur antithrombotischen und fibrinolytischen Behandlung // Klin. Wochenschr.– 1965.– Vol. 43.– P. 37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01485588.

Sutton M., Sharpe N. Left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction // Circulation.– 2000.– Vol. 101.– P. 2981–2988. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.101.25.2981.

Terkelsen C.J., Lassen J.F., Norgaard B.L. et al. Mortality rates in patients with ST-elevation vs. non-STelevation acute myocardial infarction: observations from an unselected cohort // Eur. Heart J.– 2005.– Vol. 26.– P. 18–26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehi002.

Thiele H., Rach J., Klein N. et al. LIPSIA-NSTEMI Trial Group. Optimal timing of invasive angiography in stable non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the Leipzig Immediate versus early and late Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Trial in NSTEMI (LIPSIA-NSTEMI trial) // Eur. Heart J.– 2012.– Vol. 33.– P. 2035–2043. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr418.

Touchstone D.A., Beller G.A., Nygaard T.W. et al. Effects of successful intravenous reperfusion therapy on regional myocardial function and geometry in humans: a topographic assessment using twodimensional echocardiography // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.– 1989.– Vol. 13.– P. 1506–1513. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(89)90340-9.

Van‘t Hof A.W.J., de Vries S.T., Dambrink J.-H.E. et al. A comparison of two invasive strategies in patients with non-st elevation acute coronary syndromes: Results of the early or late intervention in unstable angina (elisa) pilot study2b/3a upstream therapy and acute coronary syndromes // Eur. Heart J.– 2003.– Vol. 24.– P. 1401–1405. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0195-668x(03)00259-8.

Vetrovec G.W., Leinbach R.C., Gold H.K., Cowley M.J. Intracoronary thrombolysis in syndromes of unstable ischemia: angiographic and clinical results // Am. Heart J.– 1982.– Vol. 104.– P. 946. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-8703(82)90268-x.

Warren S.E., Royal H.D., Markis J.E. et al. Time course of left ventricular dilation after myocardial infarction: influence of infarct-related artery and success of coronary thrombolysis // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.– 1988.– Vol. 11.– P. 12–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(88)90159-3.

White H.D., Cross D.B., Elliott J.M. et al. Long-term prognostic importance of patency of the infarct-related coronary artery after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction // Circulation.– 1994.– Vol. 89.– P. 61–67. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.89.1.61.