Progression of the atherosclerotic lesions of the coronary arteries in patients after myocardial infarction at 3-year follow-up
Main Article Content
Abstract
The aim – to study and analyze the clinical and functional characteristics and parameters of lipid metabolism in patients after acute myocardial infarction (MI), depending on the progression of atherosclerosis according to the data of repeated coronary angiography (CAG) during a three-year follow-up.
Materials and methods. The study prospectively included 91 patients with primary Q-MI, 47 of whom underwent a full cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program with physical training (FT), 44 patients – had only complexes of physical exercises and distance walking in accordance with the terms of MI. For three years, CAG was performed in 38 patients, in 18 (group 1) of whom the progression of the atherosclerotic process was established, in 20 (group 2) progression was not visualized in CAG. 53 patients (group 3) had a stable satisfactory condition and refused to repeat CAG. Treatment was performed in accordance with modern guidelines with urgent stenting of the infarct-dependent coronary artery. All patients underwent dosed testing on a bicycle ergometer, echocardiography and an evaluation of lipid metabolism indicators. Control examinations were carried out at discharge on the 10-15th day of myocardial infarction and in dynamics after 1 and 3 years.
Results and discussion. Undesirable cardiovascular events (recurrent MI, coronary artery bypass grafting, restenosis, and hemodynamic significant stenoses) occurred only in the 1st group: 7 events – during the first year, also 7 – during the second year, and the last 14 – during the third year. In the second group, in the first week of myocardial infarction stent thrombosis occurred in 2 patients, coronary bypass grafting was performed according to the data of urgent coronary angiography also in 2 patients. During the 3-years follow up in the group with the progression of atherosclerosis the number of patients with diabetes mellitus tripled, and there was also a tendency to an increase in body mass index. According to the results of the exercise test on a bicycle ergometer and echocardiography, significant differences in the groups were not established, however, a positive trend in the dynamics of observation was noted in patients of the 2nd group without progression of atherosclerosis. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol values were obtained on the 5–7th day of myocardial infarction at the background of high-intensity statin therapy and were considered as basic. Further results showed the best performance in the first 6–12 months after myocardial infarction with better adherence to medical recommendations in the period as close as possible to acute MI. In the group of patients with progression of atherosclerosis, the maximum decrease in the level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (up to 2.10 (1.79–2.38) mmol/L) was observed after 6 months, followed by an increase in 1 and 3 years to a level exceeding the baseline. Variations in this indicator in patients without progression were 1.85–2.02–1.83 mmol/L, which was close to the recommended target values (up to 2019).
Conclusions. In the group with the progression of the atherosclerotic process, the number of patients with diabetes mellitus increased over 3 years and a tendency towards an increase in body mass index was observed. Most of the patients returned to smoking by the end of the first year after myocardial infarction, but then 3 years later, some of the patients in group 2 stopped smoking again, which may indicate the effectiveness of training and the psychological component of cardiac rehabilitation in the group without progression of the atherosclerotic process. The results of echocardiography and the level of exercise tolerance at the time of examination did not differ in patients with and without progression of the atherosclerotic process. Maintaining the target levels of LDL cholesterol is possible only under the condition of long-term high-intensity statin therapy under the supervision of a physician, adherence to the comprehensive recommendations of stage III CR at each contact with the patient.
Article Details
Keywords:
References
Воробьева Н.М., Карпов Ю.А. Длительная двойная антитромбоцитарная терапия – новая возможность улучшить прогноз у пациентов после инфаркта миокарда // АтмосферA. Новости кардиологии.– 2017.– № 1.– С. 2–10.
Коваленко В.М., Шумаков В.О., Малиновська І.Е. та ін. Менеджмент кардіореабілітації пацієнтів, які перенесли гострий коронарний синдром.– К., 2020.– 44 с.
Малиновская И.Э., Шумаков В.А., Терещенко Н.М. Ранняя постгоспитальная кардиореабилитация пациентов после инфаркта миокарда – основа эффективной вторичной профилактики // Укр. кардіол. журн.– 2016.– Додаток 1.– С. 126–131.
Ambrosetti M., Abreu A., Corrà U. et al. Secondary prevention through comprehensive cardiovascular rehabilitation: From knowledge to implementation. 2020 update. A position paper from the Secondary Prevention and Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology // Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol.– 2020.– Vol. 30.– Р. 2047487320913379. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487320913379.
Antman E.M., Hand M., Armstrong P.W. et al. 2007 Focused Update of the ACC/AHA 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: developed in collaboration With the Canadian Cardiovascular Society endorsed by the American Academy of Family Physicians: 2007 Writing Group to Review New Evidence and Update the ACC/AHA 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction, Writing on Behalf of the 2004 Writing Committee // Circulation.– 2008.– Vol. 117 (2).– Р. 296–329. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.188209.
Bhatt D.L., Eagle K.A., Ohman E.M. et al. REACH Registry Investigators. Comparative determinants of 4-year cardiovascular event rates in stable outpatients at risk of or with atherothrombosis // JAMA.– 2010.– Vol. 304 (12).– Р. 1350–1357. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.1322.
Castro-Dominguez Y., Dharmarajan K., Namara R.L. Predicting death after acute myocardial infarction // Trends Cardiovasc. Med.– 2018.– Vol. 28 (2).– Р. 102–109. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcm.2017.07.011.
Fox K.A., Carruthers K.F., Dunbar D.R. et al. Underestimated and under-recognized: the late consequences of acute coronary syndrome (GRACE UK-Belgian Study) // Eur. Heart J.– 2010.– Vol. 31 (22).– Р. 2755–2764. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq326.
Go A.S., Mozaffarian D., Roger V.L. et al. American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics-2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association // Circulation.– 2013.– Vol. 127 (1).– Р. 143–152. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e318282ab8f.
Jankowski P., Czarnecka D., Łysek R. et al. Secondary prevention in patients after hospitalisation due to coronary artery disease: what has changed since 2006? // Kardiologia Polska.– 2014.– Vol. 72 (4).– Р. 355–362. doi: https://doi.org/10.5603/KP.a2013.0350.
Jernberg T., Hasvold P., Henriksson M. еt al. Cardiovascular risk in post-myocardial infarction patients: nationwide real world data demonstrate the importance of a long-term perspective // Eur. Heart J.– 2015.– Vol. 36 (19).– Р. 1163–1170. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehu505.
Mal K., Awan I. D., Shaukat F. Evaluation of Risk Factors Associated with Reinfarction: A Multicenter Observational Study // Cureus.– 2019.– Vol. 11 (11).– Р. e6063. doi: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6063.
Rousan T.A., Thadani U. Stent choice in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction likely does not affect mortality or reinfarction // Evidence-Based Medicine.– 2017.– Vol. 22.– Р. 224. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmed-2017-110841.
Schubert J., Lindahl B., Melhus H. et al. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction and statin intensity in myocardial infarction patients and major adverse outcomes: a Swedish nationwide cohort study // Eur. Heart J.– 2021.– Vol. 42 (3).– Р. 243–252. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa1011.
Stone S., Serrao G., Mehran R. et al. Incidence, Predictors, and Implications of Reinfarction After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction. The Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial // Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions.– 2014.– Vol. 7.– Р. 543–551. doi: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001360.